https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:31550 I² = 83.15%). BQ performance was poor to fair with pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.66 (95%CI: 0.45, 0.83; I² = 78.65%) and 0.62 (95%CI: 0.48, 0.75; I² = 81.55%), respectively. BQ performance was heterogeneous depending on type of reference test and pregnancy. Sensitivity increased if diagnosis was based on polysomnography (0.90), and respiratory disturbance index (0.90). However, sensitivity decreased if screening was performed in early pregnancy (≤20 weeks gestation: 0.47), and high-risk pregnancy (0.44). Performance of ESS was poor with pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.44 (95%CI: 0.33, 0.56; I² = 32.8%) and 0.62 (95%CI: 0.48, 0.75; I² = 81.55%), respectively. In conclusion, BQ and ESS showed poor performance during pregnancy, hence a new OSA screening questionnaire is needed.]]> Wed 02 Oct 2019 10:27:36 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:51430 Tue 05 Sep 2023 17:47:25 AEST ]]>